-
Re: Myfonts/monotype New Agreement
I did think of Type Network as a kind of “collective bargaining” entity with regard to Adobe Fonts. It is undoubtedly helpful for TN partners — although maybe it was just as helpful that Dan and I un…7 -
Re: What were the key changes made when we started designing typefaces for screens?
A couple further thoughts on this topic. I’d say “design for screens” used to be approached completely differently because of the hardware. Screens used to be relatively predictable. Those tasked wit…11 -
Re: What were the key changes made when we started designing typefaces for screens?
It’s only tangentially related to the subject here, but I wouldn’t discount how early Adobe Originals were designed to conform to the limitations of PostScript and low-resolution printers. Especially…3 -
Re: Adobe Fonts (Creative Cloud license)
All fonts used through Adobe Fonts share the same Service Terms of Use. Anecdotally, I vaguely recall a foundry or two that attempted to assert their own limitations elsewhere (e.g. “If you use our f…4 -
Re: Copyright Registration (Any Loopholes?)
The above letter from the Copyright Office is bizarre to me, because it seems to ignore the idea that code is protectable. Instead, it rejects the typeface because visual (non-written) work isn’t pro…2
